Henry v. City of New York

205 N.E.2d 204, 15 N.Y.2d 726, 256 N.Y.S.2d 939, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1653
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 14, 1965
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 205 N.E.2d 204 (Henry v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Henry v. City of New York, 205 N.E.2d 204, 15 N.Y.2d 726, 256 N.Y.S.2d 939, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1653 (N.Y. 1965).

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs, on the majority opinion in Motyka v. City of Amsterdam (15 N Y 2d 134), decided herewith. No opinion.

Concur: Judge, Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan. Chief Judge Desmond dissents and votes to reverse upon his dissenting opinion in Motyka v. City of Amsterdam (15 N Y 2d 134, 140), decided herewith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rood Utilities, Inc. v. City of Auburn
233 A.D.2d 873 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
205 N.E.2d 204, 15 N.Y.2d 726, 256 N.Y.S.2d 939, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-v-city-of-new-york-ny-1965.