Henry v. Central Railroad & Banking Co.

15 S.E. 757, 89 Ga. 815
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided August 23, 1892·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

[815] Judgment reversed.

The evidence further disclosed that the meat which went to Brunswick was intended for one Baumgartner, on whom the plaintiff drew with bill of lading for the whole amount, before the car reached there. Baumgartner paid plaintiff the amount of the draft, and plaintiff had not refunded the amount to him. Counsel proposed to amend the declaration so that the suit ■should proceed in the name of Henry for the use of Baumgartner; bútthe court refused to allow the amendment, and this ruling also is excepted to. J. L. Anderson, for plaintiff. R. F. Lyon, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henry v. Central Railroad & Banking Co., 15 S.E. 757, 89 Ga. 815 (Ga. 1892).

15 S.E. 757 (Henry v. Central Railroad & Banking Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Starke v. Horak
260 N.W.2d 406 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1977)
Empire Aluminum Corporation v. SS KORENDIJK
391 F. Supp. 402 (S.D. Georgia, 1973)
Rome Electric Inc. v. Railway Express Agency
59 S.E.2d 19 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1950)
Inman & Co. v. Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co.
159 F. 960 (U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Georgia, 1908)
Ohlen v. Atlanta & West Point Railroad
58 S.E. 511 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Berry v. Shannon
25 S.E. 514 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1896)