Henry v. Baskerville

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 31, 2009·No. 09-7999·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7999

CHRISTOPHER S. HENRY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

AL BASKERVILLE, Warden of Powhatan Correctional Center; UNKNOWN, Correctional Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:08-cv-00561-HEH)

Submitted: December 17, 2009 Decided: December 31, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher S. Henry, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Christopher S. Henry appeals the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). Henry also appeals the district court’s

order denying his subsequent Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See Henry v. Baskerville, No. 3:08-cv-

00561-HEH (E.D. Va. Sept. 4, 2009 & Oct. 22, 2009). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henry v. Baskerville, (4th Cir. 2009).

Henry v. Baskerville (Henry v. Baskerville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related