Henry Tien v. Tax Collector
This text of Henry Tien v. Tax Collector (Henry Tien v. Tax Collector) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed December 18, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D23-2067 Lower Tribunal No. 22-9817 ________________
Henry Tien, Appellant,
vs.
Tax Collector, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Maria de Jesus Santovenia, Judge.
Henry Tien, in proper person.
Geraldine Bonzon-Keenan, Miami-Dade County Attorney, and Veronica Sanchez, Assistant County Attorney, for appellee.
Before MILLER, GORDO and GOODEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Because the trial court did not err when it dismissed the second
amended complaint, we hereby affirm. The second amended complaint
failed to state a cause of action for declaratory relief. See § 86.011, Fla. Stat.
(2024) (“The court may render declaratory judgments on the existence, or
nonexistence . . . [o]f any immunity, power, privilege, or right . . . .”); May v.
Holley, 59 So. 2d 636, 639 (Fla. 1952) (setting forth the requirements of a
declaration judgment action); State, Dep’t of Env’t Prot. v. Garcia, 99 So. 3d
539, 544-45 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (explaining required showing by party
seeking declaration).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Henry Tien v. Tax Collector, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-tien-v-tax-collector-fladistctapp-2024.