Henry Tien v. Tax Collector
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed December 18, 2024.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 3D23-2067
Lower Tribunal No. 22-9817
Henry Tien,
Appellant,
vs.
Tax Collector,
Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Maria de Jesus Santovenia, Judge.
Henry Tien, in proper person.
Geraldine Bonzon-Keenan, Miami-Dade County Attorney, and Veronica Sanchez, Assistant County Attorney, for appellee.
Before MILLER, GORDO and GOODEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Because the trial court did not err when it dismissed the second amended complaint, we hereby affirm. The second amended complaint failed to state a cause of action for declaratory relief. See § 86.011, Fla. Stat. (2024) (“The court may render declaratory judgments on the existence, or nonexistence . . . [o]f any immunity, power, privilege, or right . . . .”); May v. Holley, 59 So. 2d 636, 639 (Fla. 1952) (setting forth the requirements of a declaration judgment action); State, Dep’t of Env’t Prot. v. Garcia, 99 So. 3d 539, 544-45 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (explaining required showing by party seeking declaration).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Henry Tien v. Tax Collector (Henry Tien v. Tax Collector) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.