Henry Telles v. County of Stanislaus
This text of 669 F. App'x 471 (Henry Telles v. County of Stanislaus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Henry William Telles appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment follow *472 ing a jury trial in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging Fourth Amendment violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
We cannot review any of Telles’ contentions challenging his jury trial because Telles has failed to provide the relevant pre-trial and trial transcripts required to review the alleged errors. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(2); Syncom Capital Corp. v. Wade, 924 F.2d 167, 169-70 (9th Cir. 1991) (dismissing appeal by pro se appellant for failure to provide trial transcripts).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
669 F. App'x 471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-telles-v-county-of-stanislaus-ca9-2016.