Henry Skinner v. Lynn Switzer

Fifth Circuit

Henry Skinner v. Lynn Switzer

425 F. App'x 409

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Henry Skinner v. Lynn Switzer. Read the opinion of the Court — 363 F. App'x 302 →

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 18, 2011·No. 10-70002·Unpublished

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PER CURIAM: *

The Supreme Court reversed and remanded this court’s affirmance of the district court’s dismissal. Skinner v. Switzer, — U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 1289, 179 L.Ed.2d 233 (2011). We VACATE and REMAND the judgment of the district court for further proceedings in accordance with the *410 Supreme Court’s directive. We express no view on what decisions the district court should make on remand.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PER CURIAM: *

The Supreme Court reversed and remanded this court’s affirmance of the district court’s dismissal. Skinner v. Switzer, — U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 1289, 179 L.Ed.2d 233 (2011). We VACATE and REMAND the judgment of the district court for further proceedings in accordance with the *410 Supreme Court’s directive. We express no view on what decisions the district court should make on remand.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Henry Skinner v. Lynn Switzer, 425 F. App'x 409 (5th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

425 F. App'x 409 (Henry Skinner v. Lynn Switzer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related