Henry S. Lester v. Knox Creek Coal Corporation Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

45 F.3d 426, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 5841, 1995 WL 3835
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 6, 1995
Docket94-1413
StatusPublished

This text of 45 F.3d 426 (Henry S. Lester v. Knox Creek Coal Corporation Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Henry S. Lester v. Knox Creek Coal Corporation Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, 45 F.3d 426, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 5841, 1995 WL 3835 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

45 F.3d 426
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Henry S. LESTER, Petitioner,
v.
KNOX CREEK COAL CORPORATION; Director, Office of Workers'
Compensation Programs, United States Department of
Labor, Respondents.

No. 94-1413.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: August 9, 1994.
Decided: January 6, 1995.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (92-2381-BLA)

Henry S. Lester, Petitioner Pro Se. Ronald Eugene Gilbertson, KILCULLEN, WILSON & KILCULLEN, Washington, DC; Karen Nancy Blank, Christian P. Barber, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, DC, for Respondents.

Ben.Rev.Bd.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. Secs. 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp.1993). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Lester v. Knox Creek Coal Corp., No. 92-2381-BLA (B.R.B. Feb. 25, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 F.3d 426, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 5841, 1995 WL 3835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-s-lester-v-knox-creek-coal-corporation-direc-ca4-1995.