Henry Rawson Jr and Susan Rawson v. Oxea Corporation and Dashiell Corporation
This text of Henry Rawson Jr and Susan Rawson v. Oxea Corporation and Dashiell Corporation (Henry Rawson Jr and Susan Rawson v. Oxea Corporation and Dashiell Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum Order issued June 28, 2016
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-15-01005-CV ——————————— HENRY RAWSON, JR. AND SUSAN RAWSON, Appellants V. OXEA CORPORATION, DASHIELL CORPORATION, AND MUNDY MAINTENANCE AND SERVICES, LLC, Appellees
On Appeal from the 190th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2015-07842
MEMORANDUM ORDER Appellants, Henry Rawson, Jr. and Susan Rawson, have filed a motion to
dismiss their appeal against appellee Mundy Maintenance and Services, LLC,
stating that they have settled this personal injury action against them, and further request that this Court assess costs against the party that incurred them. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (d). Appellants state that this motion does not affect the
status of their appeal against appellees Oxea Corporation and Dashiell Corporation.
While there is no certificate of conference with the motion to dismiss, the
motion contains a certificate of service on counsel for all three appellees, the
motion has been on file with this Court for more than ten days, and no party has
responded to the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a)(2). No other
party has filed a notice of appeal and no opinion has issued. See id. 42.1(a)(1), (c).
CONCLUSION Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal against Mundy
Maintenance and Services, LLC, with costs to be taxed against the party who
incurred the same upon issuance of this Court’s judgment. See TEX. R. APP. P.
42.1(a)(1), (d), 43.2(f). The appeal against appellees Oxea Corporation and
Dashiell Corporation remains pending. See id. 42.1(b).
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Higley, Bland, and Massengale.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Henry Rawson Jr and Susan Rawson v. Oxea Corporation and Dashiell Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-rawson-jr-and-susan-rawson-v-oxea-corporation-and-dashiell-texapp-2016.