Henry Petetin, Inc. v. Standard General Realty Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Henry Petetin, Inc. v. Standard General Realty Co.

139 So. 33, 18 La. App. 601

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedJanuary 25, 1932

DocketNo. 13859

StatusPublished

This text of 139 So. 33 (Henry Petetin, Inc. v. Standard General Realty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Henry Petetin, Inc. v. Standard General Realty Co., 139 So. 33, 18 La. App. 601 (La. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

WBSTERFIELD, J.

This suit is for the sum of $292.50, the alleged. value of certain printing undertaken by the plaintiff for account of defendant. It is defended upon the ground that the charge is excessive. There was judgment below in plaintiff’s favor, as prayed for, and defendant has appealed.

It does not appear to us that the defense has been sustained by the evidence. According to the testimony for both sides, a profit of 25 or 30 per cent, is not unreasonable and not unusual in the printing business. Plaintiff’s profit did not exceed this figure, and, in the absence of any showing that plaintiff’s operating expenses were unusual, when compared with others in the same business, we cannot say that the charge is improper.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WBSTERFIELD, J.

This suit is for the sum of $292.50, the alleged. value of certain printing undertaken by the plaintiff for account of defendant. It is defended upon the ground that the charge is excessive. There was judgment below in plaintiff’s favor, as prayed for, and defendant has appealed.

It does not appear to us that the defense has been sustained by the evidence. According to the testimony for both sides, a profit of 25 or 30 per cent, is not unreasonable and not unusual in the printing business. Plaintiff’s profit did not exceed this figure, and, in the absence of any showing that plaintiff’s operating expenses were unusual, when compared with others in the same business, we cannot say that the charge is improper.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 So. 33, 18 La. App. 601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-petetin-inc-v-standard-general-realty-co-lactapp-1932.