Henry Petetin, Inc. v. Board of Levee Com'rs

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Henry Petetin, Inc. v. Board of Levee Com'rs

144 So. 280

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedNovember 14, 1932

DocketNo. 14247.

StatusPublished

This text of 144 So. 280 (Henry Petetin, Inc. v. Board of Levee Com'rs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Henry Petetin, Inc. v. Board of Levee Com'rs, 144 So. 280 (La. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We granted a rehearing in this matter because of the possibility that we were in error with reference to the amount awarded plaintiff -in our decree. A reconsideration leads to"the belief that the amount should have been based in accordance with article 2765 of the Civil Code and that plaintiff should have been awarded an amount sufficient to compensate it “for the expense and labor already incurred, and such damages as the nature of the case may require.”

On this basis we believe that the amount awarded below, to wit, $848.50, was correct. ,

It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that our original decree be, and it is, amended by increasing the amount thereof to $848.50, with legal interest from judicial demand until paid and for all costs, and, as thus amended, it be reinstated and made the final decree of this court.

Original decree amended and reinstated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We granted a rehearing in this matter because of the possibility that we were in error with reference to the amount awarded plaintiff -in our decree. A reconsideration leads to"the belief that the amount should have been based in accordance with article 2765 of the Civil Code and that plaintiff should have been awarded an amount sufficient to compensate it “for the expense and labor already incurred, and such damages as the nature of the case may require.”

On this basis we believe that the amount awarded below, to wit, $848.50, was correct. ,

It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that our original decree be, and it is, amended by increasing the amount thereof to $848.50, with legal interest from judicial demand until paid and for all costs, and, as thus amended, it be reinstated and made the final decree of this court.

Original decree amended and reinstated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

144 So. 280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-petetin-inc-v-board-of-levee-comrs-lactapp-1932.