Henry Pearson v. Michael Pearson
This text of Henry Pearson v. Michael Pearson (Henry Pearson v. Michael Pearson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
|
|
In The
Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
______________________________
No. 06-09-00105-CV
HENRY PEARSON, Appellant
V.
MICHAEL PEARSON, Appellee
On Appeal from the 5th Judicial District Court
Bowie County, Texas
Trial Court No. 09C0698-005
Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On December 17, 2009, we mailed a letter to appellant, who is representing himself, requesting that he show this Court how we had jurisdiction over this appeal regarding a potential defect in that the judgment does not appear to dispose of named defendants Pearson Realty Investments, L.L.C., or Porter-McClure Co., Inc., thereby depriving this Court of jurisdiction under Lehmann v. Harcon, 39 S.W.3d 191 (Tex. 2001).
In that letter, we directed appellant to show this Court how we had jurisdiction and informed him that if no response was received by December 28, 2009, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. It is now January 21, 2010, and no response has been received.
We dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Jack Carter
Justice
Date Submitted: January 21, 2010
Date Decided: January 22, 2010
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Henry Pearson v. Michael Pearson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-pearson-v-michael-pearson-texapp-2010.