Henry N.V. v. Dawn M.V.
32 A.D.3d 1293, 821 N.Y.S.2d 528
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 29, 2006·Published
Opinion
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (Bernadette T. Romano, J.), entered August 1, 2005 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, adjudged that respondent willfully violated a visitation order.
It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs as moot (see Matter of Kenyon v Kenyon, 266 AD2d 746 [1999]). Present — Scudder, J.P., Kehoe, Gorski, Smith and Pine, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Henry N.V. v. Dawn M.V., 32 A.D.3d 1293, 821 N.Y.S.2d 528 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).
32 A.D.3d 1293 (Henry N.V. v. Dawn M.V.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kenyon v. Kenyon
266 A.D.2d 746 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)