Henry Monroe v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Henry Monroe v. United States

359 F.2d 380

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJune 6, 1966

Docket22474

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 359 F.2d 380 (Henry Monroe v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Henry Monroe v. United States, 359 F.2d 380 (5th Cir. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant asserts questions in a proceeding brought under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 which were assigned as error on the direct appeal of his case. Each was there decided adversely to him. Monroe v. United States, 5 Cir., 1963, 320 F.2d 277, cert. den., 375 U.S. 991, 84 S.Ct. 630, 11 L.Ed.2d 478. We are not convinced that the ruling then made was incorrect. The disposition of affirmance comes well within the teaching of Sanders v. United States, 1963, 373 U.S. 1, 83 S.Ct. 1068, 10 L.Ed.2d 148.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Appellant asserts questions in a proceeding brought under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 which were assigned as error on the direct appeal of his case. Each was there decided adversely to him. Monroe v. United States, 5 Cir., 1963, 320 F.2d 277, cert. den., 375 U.S. 991, 84 S.Ct. 630, 11 L.Ed.2d 478. We are not convinced that the ruling then made was incorrect. The disposition of affirmance comes well within the teaching of Sanders v. United States, 1963, 373 U.S. 1, 83 S.Ct. 1068, 10 L.Ed.2d 148.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

359 F.2d 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-monroe-v-united-states-ca5-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack