Henry Monroe v. United States

359 F.2d 380
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 6, 1966·No. 22474·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant asserts questions in a proceeding brought under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 which were assigned as error on the direct appeal of his case. Each was there decided adversely to him. Monroe v. United States, 5 Cir., 1963, 320 F.2d 277, cert. den., 375 U.S. 991, 84 S.Ct. 630, 11 L.Ed.2d 478. We are not convinced that the ruling then made was incorrect. The disposition of affirmance comes well within the teaching of Sanders v. United States, 1963, 373 U.S. 1, 83 S.Ct. 1068, 10 L.Ed.2d 148.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henry Monroe v. United States, 359 F.2d 380 (5th Cir. 1966).

359 F.2d 380 (Henry Monroe v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Monroe v. United States
288 F. Supp. 139 (E.D. Louisiana, 1968)
Henry Monroe v. United States
389 F.2d 1005 (Fifth Circuit, 1968)