Henry McCall v. Homer Hillis
This text of Henry McCall v. Homer Hillis (Henry McCall v. Homer Hillis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas July 18, 2017
No. 04-17-00410-CV
Henry MCCALL, Appellant
v.
Homer HILLIS, Appellee
From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas Trial Court No. 14417 Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding
ORDER
Because the appellate record has not been filed in this Court as of yet, appellant’s brief is not yet due. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). Nevertheless, Appellant filed a pro se brief on July 10, 2017. Appellant’s brief, however, violates Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38 in that it does not include record references. The reason appellant’s brief does not include references to the appellate record is because the appellate record has not as yet been filed in this Court. Therefore, we STRIKE appellant’s brief. Appellant may file his brief after the appellate record has been filed.
_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 18th day of July, 2017.
___________________________________ Luz Estrada Chief Deputy Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Henry McCall v. Homer Hillis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-mccall-v-homer-hillis-texapp-2017.