Henry Martin Company v. . Taylor
134 N.E. 599, 232 N.Y. 627, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 1216
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Henry Martin Company v. . Taylor, 134 N.E. 599, 232 N.Y. 627, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 1216 (N.Y. 1922).
134 N.E. 599 (Henry Martin Company v. . Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cornell Dubilier Electric Corp. v. Press Wireless, Inc.
175 F.2d 538 (Second Circuit, 1949)