Henry Marcus Swinney v. State
This text of Henry Marcus Swinney v. State (Henry Marcus Swinney v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILE COPY
CAUSE NO. 12-14-00142-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS
HENRY MARCUS SWINNEY, } APPEALED FROM 114TH DISTRICT COURT APPELLANT
V. } IN AND FOR
THE STATE OF TEXAS, } SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS APPELLEE
ORDER
Came on for consideration the Appellant’s Pro Se Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief in the above-referenced cause, and it appearing that Appellant’s counsel has filed an Anders brief herein and that Appellant has been unable to examine the record so that he can file a pro se brief, it is hereby ORDERED that the trial court ensure that Appellant has the opportunity to fully examine the appellate record on or before January 30, 2015, and it is FURTHER ORDERED that the trial court notify this Court in writing as to the date or dates upon which the appellate record was made available to Appellant and the amount of time for which Appellant had access to the record on each date. Appellant shall have thirty (30) days from the day the appellate record was first made available to him to file his pro se brief with this Court. WITNESS THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice, Court of Appeals District, Tyler, Texas. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE at Tyler, Texas, this 31 day of December 2014, A.D.
Respectfully yours, CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK
By: _______________________________________ Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Henry Marcus Swinney v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-marcus-swinney-v-state-texapp-2014.