Henry Long v. United States

Sixth Circuit

Henry Long v. United States

245 F.2d 871, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3296

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedJune 4, 1957

Docket13141

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 245 F.2d 871 (Henry Long v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Henry Long v. United States, 245 F.2d 871, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3296 (6th Cir. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard on the briefs of the parties, and it appearing that the matters set forth in appellant’s motion to vacate sentence were previously decided by the *872 district court and affirmed by this court in Long v. United States, 6 Cir., 235 F.2d 183; and it appearing that under the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C.A., § 2255, the sentencing court shall not be required to entertain a second or successive motion for similar relief on behalf of the same prisoner; and there appearing no abuse of discretion on the part of the district court in its determination denying appellant’s motion, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the order of the district court be and is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard on the briefs of the parties, and it appearing that the matters set forth in appellant’s motion to vacate sentence were previously decided by the *872 district court and affirmed by this court in Long v. United States, 6 Cir., 235 F.2d 183; and it appearing that under the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C.A., § 2255, the sentencing court shall not be required to entertain a second or successive motion for similar relief on behalf of the same prisoner; and there appearing no abuse of discretion on the part of the district court in its determination denying appellant’s motion, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the order of the district court be and is hereby affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 F.2d 871, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-long-v-united-states-ca6-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack