Henry L. Stepler v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority Raymond E. Capots Wilson John Jones, Supervisor for Parole Officers in Guernsey County

905 F.2d 1539, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 10116, 1990 WL 84230
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedJune 21, 1990
Docket90-3120
StatusUnpublished

This text of 905 F.2d 1539 (Henry L. Stepler v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority Raymond E. Capots Wilson John Jones, Supervisor for Parole Officers in Guernsey County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Henry L. Stepler v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority Raymond E. Capots Wilson John Jones, Supervisor for Parole Officers in Guernsey County, 905 F.2d 1539, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 10116, 1990 WL 84230 (6th Cir. 1990).

Opinion

905 F.2d 1539

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Henry L. STEPLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
OHIO ADULT PAROLE AUTHORITY; Raymond E. Capots; Wilson;
John Jones, Supervisor for Parole Officers in
Guernsey County, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-3120.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

June 21, 1990.

Before KEITH and NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judges, and ENGEL, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

This matter is before the court upon consideration of the appellees' motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The appellant has responded and filed motions for appointment of counsel, bail pending appeal, and an injunction.

A review of the record indicates that the civil action was dismissed by judgment entered November 14, 1989. A motion for relief from judgment was served on November 20, 1989. Appellant's motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis was filed January 5, 1990, and treated as a notice of appeal. The motion for relief from judgment was denied by order entered January 16, 1990.

A motion which seeks reconsideration of a judgment and which is served within ten days of entry of a judgment is properly construed as a time-tolling Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. The motion for relief was served within ten days of entry of the judgment and tolled the appeal period. See Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(4); Osterneck v. Ernst & Whinney, 109 S.Ct. 987, 992 (1989); Rados v. Celotex Corp., 809 F.2d 170, 171 (2d Cir.1986); Harcon Barge Co. v. D & G Boat Rentals, Inc., 784 F.2d 665, 668-69 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 (1986). Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(4) provides that a notice of appeal filed before the disposition of a timely Rule 59 motion shall have no effect. A timely notice of appeal is mandatory and jurisdictional. Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., 459 U.S. 56, 61 (1982) (per curiam). The appellant did not file a new notice of appeal after entry of the order denying relief from the judgment.

It is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be, and it hereby is, dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Rule 8, Rules of the Sixth Circuit. The motions for appointment of counsel, bail and injunction are denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.
459 U.S. 56 (Supreme Court, 1982)
Osterneck v. Ernst & Whinney
489 U.S. 169 (Supreme Court, 1989)
United States v. Heightland (Arnold Ray)
905 F.2d 1539 (Sixth Circuit, 1990)
Harcon Barge Co. v. D & G Boat Rentals, Inc.
784 F.2d 665 (Fifth Circuit, 1986)
Rados v. Celotex Corp.
809 F.2d 170 (Second Circuit, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
905 F.2d 1539, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 10116, 1990 WL 84230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-l-stepler-v-ohio-adult-parole-authority-raymond-e-capots-wilson-ca6-1990.