Henry Hartwell Hester Architect A. I. A. v. Van Heusden

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Henry Hartwell Hester Architect A. I. A. v. Van Heusden

349 So. 2d 810

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 12, 1977·No. No. DD-307·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the issues under point one of appellant’s brief and having determined that we do not have jurisdiction to consider those issues, Eristavitchitcherine v. Miami Beach Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n, 154 Fla. 100, 16 So.2d 730 (1944) and Hollywood Inc. v. Clark, 153 Fla. 501, 15 So.2d 175 (1943), that portion of appellant’s appeal incorporated under point one is dismissed.

Having determined from the record and the briefs of the parties there is substantial competent evidence to support the deficiency judgment, the deficiency judgment is affirmed.

RAWLS, Acting C. J., and SMITH and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the issues under point one of appellant’s brief and having determined that we do not have jurisdiction to consider those issues, Eristavitchitcherine v. Miami Beach Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n, 154 Fla. 100, 16 So.2d 730 (1944) and Hollywood Inc. v. Clark, 153 Fla. 501, 15 So.2d 175 (1943), that portion of appellant’s appeal incorporated under point one is dismissed.

Having determined from the record and the briefs of the parties there is substantial competent evidence to support the deficiency judgment, the deficiency judgment is affirmed.

RAWLS, Acting C. J., and SMITH and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Henry Hartwell Hester Architect A. I. A. v. Van Heusden, 349 So. 2d 810 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

349 So. 2d 810 (Henry Hartwell Hester Architect A. I. A. v. Van Heusden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related