Henry Hartwell Hester Architect A. I. A. v. Van Heusden

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Henry Hartwell Hester Architect A. I. A. v. Van Heusden

349 So. 2d 810

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 12, 1977

DocketNo. DD-307

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 349 So. 2d 810 (Henry Hartwell Hester Architect A. I. A. v. Van Heusden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Henry Hartwell Hester Architect A. I. A. v. Van Heusden, 349 So. 2d 810 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the issues under point one of appellant’s brief and having determined that we do not have jurisdiction to consider those issues, Eristavitchitcherine v. Miami Beach Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n, 154 Fla. 100, 16 So.2d 730 (1944) and Hollywood Inc. v. Clark, 153 Fla. 501, 15 So.2d 175 (1943), that portion of appellant’s appeal incorporated under point one is dismissed.

Having determined from the record and the briefs of the parties there is substantial competent evidence to support the deficiency judgment, the deficiency judgment is affirmed.

RAWLS, Acting C. J., and SMITH and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the issues under point one of appellant’s brief and having determined that we do not have jurisdiction to consider those issues, Eristavitchitcherine v. Miami Beach Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n, 154 Fla. 100, 16 So.2d 730 (1944) and Hollywood Inc. v. Clark, 153 Fla. 501, 15 So.2d 175 (1943), that portion of appellant’s appeal incorporated under point one is dismissed.

Having determined from the record and the briefs of the parties there is substantial competent evidence to support the deficiency judgment, the deficiency judgment is affirmed.

RAWLS, Acting C. J., and SMITH and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

349 So. 2d 810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-hartwell-hester-architect-a-i-a-v-van-heusden-fladistctapp-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack