Henry H. Tuttle Co v. Phipps
This text of 107 N.E. 354 (Henry H. Tuttle Co v. Phipps) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case is concluded by the decision in Fera v. Child, 115 Mass. 32. No distinction should be made between the agreement in the lease in that case and that in the lease in the case at bar. That decision should not be overruled. The distinction between Fera v. Child, ubi supra, and Smith v. Faxon, 156 Mass. 589, is fully explained in the latter case.
Judgment for the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
107 N.E. 354, 219 Mass. 474, 1914 Mass. LEXIS 1575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-h-tuttle-co-v-phipps-mass-1914.