Henry F. Warden, Jr. v. United States

25 F.3d 1042, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20889, 1994 WL 251006
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 10, 1994
Docket93-7206
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 25 F.3d 1042 (Henry F. Warden, Jr. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Henry F. Warden, Jr. v. United States, 25 F.3d 1042, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20889, 1994 WL 251006 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

25 F.3d 1042
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Henry F. WARDEN, Jr., Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant Appellee.

No. 93-7206.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 22, 1994.
June 10, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Franklin T. Dupree, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-90-30-D)

Henry F. Warden, Jr., appellant pro se.

Richard Bruce Conely, Asst. U.S. Atty., Linda Kaye Teal, Office of the United States Atty., Raleigh, NC, for appellee.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before LUTTIG and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Henry Franklin Warden, Jr., appeals from the district court's order that dismissed his suit under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. Secs. 2671-2680 (West 1965 & Supp.1993). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Warden v. United States, No. CA-90-30-D (E.D.N.C. Sept. 2, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Frazier v. Angel Medical Center
308 F. Supp. 2d 671 (W.D. North Carolina, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 F.3d 1042, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20889, 1994 WL 251006, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-f-warden-jr-v-united-states-ca4-1994.