HENRY Et Al. v. WARNER, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY, Et Al.

Supreme Court

HENRY Et Al. v. WARNER, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY, Et Al.

412 U.S. 1201, 36 L. Ed. 2d 953, 93 S. Ct. 2284, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 2402

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMay 18, 1973

DocketA-1124

StatusPublished

This text of 412 U.S. 1201 (HENRY Et Al. v. WARNER, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY, Et Al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

HENRY Et Al. v. WARNER, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY, Et Al., 412 U.S. 1201, 36 L. Ed. 2d 953, 93 S. Ct. 2284, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 2402 (1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Douglas, Circuit Justice.

The application for an order vacating the stay of the Court of Appeals is denied on the representation of the Solicitor General that the named applicants in the case have all been released from confinement and that within the Central District of California no persons are currently confined in any military detention facility as a result of a conviction by summary court-martial without the aid of counsel. Whether the District Court has authority to issue a writ of habeas corpus for unnamed members of the class outside the District and/or on a worldwide basis is so novel a question that an order granting such relief should be issued only after full argument. Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Douglas, Circuit Justice.

The application for an order vacating the stay of the Court of Appeals is denied on the representation of the Solicitor General that the named applicants in the case have all been released from confinement and that within the Central District of California no persons are currently confined in any military detention facility as a result of a conviction by summary court-martial without the aid of counsel. Whether the District Court has authority to issue a writ of habeas corpus for unnamed members of the class outside the District and/or on a worldwide basis is so novel a question that an order granting such relief should be issued only after full argument. Application denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

412 U.S. 1201, 36 L. Ed. 2d 953, 93 S. Ct. 2284, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 2402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-et-al-v-warner-secretary-of-the-navy-et-al-scotus-1973.