Henry D. Langling Co. v. Elflein

230 A.D. 731
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1930·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

This record contains no decision or proposed findings although it was disposed of after a hearing of both the plaintiff and the [732] defendants. The ease is remitted to Special Term for the making of findings upon which it is deemed the judgment herein may rest. The present judgment will have to be vacated first and after a decision is signed a new judgment may then be entered. The record does not contain the exhibits which were considered by the trial court and is, therefore, incomplete in that respect. If and when the foregoing directions are complied with, the case may be brought on for argument, in the usual course. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henry D. Langling Co. v. Elflein, 230 A.D. 731 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

230 A.D. 731 (Henry D. Langling Co. v. Elflein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Callan v. M. Patane Co.
237 A.D. 901 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1933)
Corley v. Spitzer
235 A.D. 703 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)