Henry Clarke Webb v. Charles H. Angstadt, Iii, Chief, Personnel Services, Veterans Administration Medical Center

961 F.2d 212, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 19014, 1992 WL 90280
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 4, 1992
Docket91-2723
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 961 F.2d 212 (Henry Clarke Webb v. Charles H. Angstadt, Iii, Chief, Personnel Services, Veterans Administration Medical Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Henry Clarke Webb v. Charles H. Angstadt, Iii, Chief, Personnel Services, Veterans Administration Medical Center, 961 F.2d 212, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 19014, 1992 WL 90280 (4th Cir. 1992).

Opinion

961 F.2d 212

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Henry Clarke WEBB, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Charles H. ANGSTADT, III, Chief, Personnel Services,
Veterans Administration Medical Center, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 91-2723.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 1, 1992
Decided: May 4, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Chief District Judge. (CA-90-360-R)

Henry Clarke Webb, Appellant Pro Se.

Jean Martel Barrett, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL, PHILLIPS, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Henry Clarke Webb appeals from the district court's order denying Webb's Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion reveals that the district court did not abuse its discretion and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Webb v. Angstadt, No. CA-90-360-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 24 and Nov. 1, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Frank P. Unis, Jr., A/K/A Willie
961 F.2d 212 (Fourth Circuit, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
961 F.2d 212, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 19014, 1992 WL 90280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-clarke-webb-v-charles-h-angstadt-iii-chief-p-ca4-1992.