Henry Chavez v. State
This text of Henry Chavez v. State (Henry Chavez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISMISS and Opinion Filed December 12, 2018
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-01461-CR
HENRY CHAVEZ, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F18-00225-H
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Myers, and Justice Stoddart Opinion by Chief Justice Wright Henry Chavez appeals his conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon. After
appellant pleaded guilty under a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court found him
guilty and assessed punishment, enhanced by a prior felony conviction, at ten years in prison.
Appellant then filed this appeal.
A defendant perfects his appeal by timely filing a written notice of appeal with the trial
court clerk. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(c). To be timely, the notice of appeal must be filed within
thirty days after the date sentence was imposed or within ninety days after sentencing if the
defendant timely filed a motion for new trial. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a). In the absence of a
timely perfected notice of appeal, the Court must dismiss the appeal. Ex parte Castillo, 369
S.W.3d 196, 198 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012). In this case, the trial court entered judgment on July 9, 2018. Because appellant did not
file a motion for new trial, appellant’s notice of appeal was due on August 8, 2018. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed until December 5, 2018. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 25.2(c)(1). Under these circumstances, we conclude appellant’s notice of appeal was
untimely and we must dismiss the appeal.1
We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
/Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b) 181461F.U05
1 We also note that under the plea bargain agreement, appellant waived his right to appeal, and the trial court certified that appellant waived his right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2; Dears v. State, 154 S.W. 3d 610, 613 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding when right to appeal is waived in plea bargain between defendant and State, and trial court certifies defendant waived right, court of appeals lacks jurisdiction and must dismiss appeal)..
–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
HENRY CHAVEZ, Appellant On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-18-01461-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. F18-00225-H. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Myers and Stoddart participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Judgment entered December 12, 2018.
–3–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Henry Chavez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-chavez-v-state-texapp-2018.