Henry Bell v. City of Jacksonville and Jacksonville Transportation Authority
This text of Henry Bell v. City of Jacksonville and Jacksonville Transportation Authority (Henry Bell v. City of Jacksonville and Jacksonville Transportation Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D18-2615 _____________________________
HENRY BELL,
Appellant,
v.
CITY OF JACKSONVILLE and JACKSONVILLE TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY,
Appellees. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Eric C. Roberson, Judge.
August 23, 2019
PER CURIAM.
Henry Bell appeals an order dismissing his negligence claim against the Jacksonville Transit Authority. We find no error in the trial court’s dismissal of the claim on statute of limitations grounds. The claim, asserted for the first time against the JTA in the amended complaint, was untimely and did not relate back to the claims asserted in the original complaint against the City of Jacksonville, a separate and distinct legal entity. See Patel v. Sch. Bd. of Volusia Cty., 813 So. 2d 135, 136 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (finding that the county and the county school board were not sufficiently related to justify application of the relation-back doctrine). Bell also appeals a separate order granting partial summary judgment to the City of Jacksonville. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(k) (providing that partial final judgments are reviewable either on appeal from the partial final judgment or on appeal from the final judgment in the entire case); Roessler v. Novak, 858 So. 2d 1158, 1160 n.1 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). This portion of the appeal is dismissed as untimely. See, e.g., Wagner v. Wells Fargo Bank, N. A., 249 So. 3d 620 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018) (“Timely filing of the notice of appeal is jurisdictional.”).
AFFIRMED in part and DISMISSED in part.
ROWE, JAY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Michael D. McGrath and M. Brad Gibson of McGrath Gibson, LLC, Jacksonville, for Appellant.
Katy A. Harris, Office of General Counsel, City of Jacksonville, for City of Jacksonville; Beverly A. Pohl of Nelson Mullins Broad and Cassel, Fort Lauderdale, and Richard N. Milian of Nelson Mullins Broad and Cassel, Orlando, for Jacksonville Transportation Authority, Appellees.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Henry Bell v. City of Jacksonville and Jacksonville Transportation Authority, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-bell-v-city-of-jacksonville-and-jacksonville-transportation-fladistctapp-2019.