Henry Antonio Taylor v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Henry Antonio Taylor v. State

DecidedSeptember 10, 2014

DocketA14A2231

StatusPublished

This text of Henry Antonio Taylor v. State (Henry Antonio Taylor v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Henry Antonio Taylor v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,__________________ August 26, 2014

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A14A2231. HENRY ANTONIO TAYLOR v. THE STATE.

Henry Antonio Taylor was found guilty of armed robbery and false imprisonment, and we affirmed his convictions on appeal. Taylor v. State, 318 Ga. App. 115 (733 SE2d 415) (2012). He later filed a “Motion to Correct a Void Judgment,” which the trial court denied. Taylor now appeals to this Court. “[A] petition to vacate or modify a judgment of conviction is not an appropriate remedy in a criminal case.” Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 218 (1) (686 SE2d 786) (2009). Any appeal from an order denying or dismissing such a motion must be dismissed. See Harper, supra; Roberts v. State, 286 Ga. 532 (690 SE2d 150) (2010). A direct appeal may lie from an order denying or dismissing a motion to correct a void sentence, but only if the defendant raises a colorable claim that the sentence is, in fact, void or illegal. See Harper, supra at n.1; Burg v. State, 297 Ga. App. 118, 119 (676 SE2d 465) (2009). A sentence is void only when the trial court imposes punishment that the law does not allow. Jordan v. State, 253 Ga. App. 510, 511 (1) (559 SE2d 528) (2002). Taylor does not argue that his sentence exceeded legal limits; rather, he claims that he received ineffective assistance of counsel, that his indictment was defective, and that he is actually innocent of the charged crimes. These are challenges to the validity of his convictions, not his sentence. Because Taylor has not raised a colorable argument that his sentence is void, this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 08/26/2014 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,__________________ August 26, 2014

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A14A2231. HENRY ANTONIO TAYLOR v. THE STATE.

Henry Antonio Taylor was found guilty of armed robbery and false imprisonment, and we affirmed his convictions on appeal. Taylor v. State, 318 Ga. App. 115 (733 SE2d 415) (2012). He later filed a “Motion to Correct a Void Judgment,” which the trial court denied. Taylor now appeals to this Court. “[A] petition to vacate or modify a judgment of conviction is not an appropriate remedy in a criminal case.” Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 218 (1) (686 SE2d 786) (2009). Any appeal from an order denying or dismissing such a motion must be dismissed. See Harper, supra; Roberts v. State, 286 Ga. 532 (690 SE2d 150) (2010). A direct appeal may lie from an order denying or dismissing a motion to correct a void sentence, but only if the defendant raises a colorable claim that the sentence is, in fact, void or illegal. See Harper, supra at n.1; Burg v. State, 297 Ga. App. 118, 119 (676 SE2d 465) (2009). A sentence is void only when the trial court imposes punishment that the law does not allow. Jordan v. State, 253 Ga. App. 510, 511 (1) (559 SE2d 528) (2002). Taylor does not argue that his sentence exceeded legal limits; rather, he claims that he received ineffective assistance of counsel, that his indictment was defective, and that he is actually innocent of the charged crimes. These are challenges to the validity of his convictions, not his sentence. Because Taylor has not raised a colorable argument that his sentence is void, this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 08/26/2014 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Henry Antonio Taylor v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-antonio-taylor-v-state-gactapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack