Henry A. Wess, Inc. v. United States

43 Cust. Ct. 587
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Henry A. Wess, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 43 Cust. Ct. 78
United States Customs Court·Decided December 23, 1959·No. Reap. Dec. 9570; Entry No. 181·Published

Opinion

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to certain items of artificial flowers, exported from Japan and entered at the port of Cincinnati, Ohio.

[588]*588Stipulated facts, upon which the case has been submitted, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question is export value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such statutory value therefor is the values returned by the appraiser, less 8 per centum commission, as shown on the invoice, and I so hold.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henry A. Wess, Inc. v. United States, 43 Cust. Ct. 587 (cusc 1959).

43 Cust. Ct. 587 (Henry A. Wess, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.