Henriquez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Henriquez v. State

782 So. 2d 969, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4768, 2001 WL 356799

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 11, 2001·No. No. 3D00-1095·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to a jury verdict, the appellant was convicted of armed burglary, two-counts of grand theft and criminal mischief as charged. This is an appeal from the trial court’s denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal and a motion to arrest judgment. Contrary to the appellant’s assertion, we find that the evidence was legally sufficient for the jury to conclude he had entered the subject residence without consent. See Baker v. State, 636 So.2d 1342 (Fla.1994); State v. Law, 559 So.2d 187 (Fla.1989); Downer v. State, 375 So.2d 840, 845 (Fla.1979).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to a jury verdict, the appellant was convicted of armed burglary, two-counts of grand theft and criminal mischief as charged. This is an appeal from the trial court’s denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal and a motion to arrest judgment. Contrary to the appellant’s assertion, we find that the evidence was legally sufficient for the jury to conclude he had entered the subject residence without consent. See Baker v. State, 636 So.2d 1342 (Fla.1994); State v. Law, 559 So.2d 187 (Fla.1989); Downer v. State, 375 So.2d 840, 845 (Fla.1979).

Affirmed.

Henriquez v. State, 782 So. 2d 969, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4768, 2001 WL 356799 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

782 So. 2d 969 (Henriquez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related