Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Henriquez v. State

Henriquez v. State

782 So. 2d 969, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4768, 2001 WL 356799
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 11, 2001
DocketNo. 3D00-1095
StatusPublished

This text of 782 So. 2d 969 (Henriquez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Henriquez v. State, 782 So. 2d 969, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4768, 2001 WL 356799 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to a jury verdict, the appellant was convicted of armed burglary, two-counts of grand theft and criminal mischief as charged. This is an appeal from the trial court’s denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal and a motion to arrest judgment. Contrary to the appellant’s assertion, we find that the evidence was legally sufficient for the jury to conclude he had entered the subject residence without consent. See Baker v. State, 636 So.2d 1342 (Fla.1994); State v. Law, 559 So.2d 187 (Fla.1989); Downer v. State, 375 So.2d 840, 845 (Fla.1979).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Downer v. State
375 So. 2d 840 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)
Baker v. State
636 So. 2d 1342 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)
State v. Law
559 So. 2d 187 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
782 So. 2d 969, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 4768, 2001 WL 356799, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henriquez-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.