Henrie v. Orangeville Saving Fund

3 Walker 169
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 15, 1884
DocketNo. 372
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Walker 169 (Henrie v. Orangeville Saving Fund) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Henrie v. Orangeville Saving Fund, 3 Walker 169 (Pa. 1884).

Opinion

The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the Common Pleas on March 16th, 1885, in the following opinion,

Per Curiam':

We concur with the learned judge that the costs in the equity proceeding, including the Master’s fee, are collectible on the bond. It was an injunction bond, and its purpose was to save harmless the defendant in error from “all loss or damage that might be sustained by reason of said injunction.” This condition is broad enough to cover all the costs claimed. There is no error in holding that the evidence to establish the wife’s title to property as against her husband’s creditors, should be such as to leave no reasonable question in view of all the circumstances in the case. We see no error in the assignments thereof.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Walker 169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henrie-v-orangeville-saving-fund-pa-1884.