Henrich v. Town Board

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Henrich v. Town Board

213 A.D.2d 814, 623 N.Y.S.2d 401, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2623

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 9, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 213 A.D.2d 814 (Henrich v. Town Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Henrich v. Town Board, 213 A.D.2d 814, 623 N.Y.S.2d 401, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2623 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Spain, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Torraca, J.), entered May 27, 1993 in Ulster County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respon[815]*815dent’s motion to dismiss the petition for failure to state a cause of action.

Petitioner was appointed as a Police Officer-Part Time for the Town of Plattekill, Ulster County, in April 1977.

* Respondent appointed petitioner as Chief of Police, on an annual basis, from 1982 until 1993. Prior to March 1993, the post of Chief of Police was filled as a non-civil service position by designation of respondent (see, Matter of Betanzos v Green, 95 Misc 2d 89).

On January 6, 1993, respondent did not reappoint petitioner for an additional annual term as Chief of Police. On March 3, 1993, an order and determination of the Ulster County Personnel Department (hereinafter the Department) established the position of Police Chief A and said position was allocated to the competitive class. Thereafter, an attempt was made to appoint petitioner to the position of Police Chief A. However, the Department refused to recognize the appointment due to petitioner’s lack of qualifications for that position.

Petitioner presently serves as the head of the Department as the unofficial "officer in charge”. Respondent now argues that the appeal is moot. We disagree. Petitioner’s present position as the unofficial "officer in charge” is not identical, equivalent or synonymous with the relief requested in the verified petition (i.e., reappointment as the Town’s Chief of Police).

However, we agree with respondent’s contention that its failure to reappoint petitioner in January 1993 is nonreviewable. The unofficial position of Chief of Police was neither a tenured or permanent civil service position or that of a public officer which would require formal charges and a hearing prior to respondent’s failure to reappoint (see, Matter of Green-smith v Incorporated Vil. of Centre Is., 109 AD2d 742). Accordingly, petitioner has failed to state a cause of action.

Petitioner’s further contentions are without merit.

Cardona P. J., Mercure, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner has held the noncompetitive position of Police Officer-Part Time from 1977 to the present.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spain, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Torraca, J.), entered May 27, 1993 in Ulster County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respon[815]*815dent’s motion to dismiss the petition for failure to state a cause of action.

Petitioner was appointed as a Police Officer-Part Time for the Town of Plattekill, Ulster County, in April 1977.

* Respondent appointed petitioner as Chief of Police, on an annual basis, from 1982 until 1993. Prior to March 1993, the post of Chief of Police was filled as a non-civil service position by designation of respondent (see, Matter of Betanzos v Green, 95 Misc 2d 89).

On January 6, 1993, respondent did not reappoint petitioner for an additional annual term as Chief of Police. On March 3, 1993, an order and determination of the Ulster County Personnel Department (hereinafter the Department) established the position of Police Chief A and said position was allocated to the competitive class. Thereafter, an attempt was made to appoint petitioner to the position of Police Chief A. However, the Department refused to recognize the appointment due to petitioner’s lack of qualifications for that position.

Petitioner presently serves as the head of the Department as the unofficial "officer in charge”. Respondent now argues that the appeal is moot. We disagree. Petitioner’s present position as the unofficial "officer in charge” is not identical, equivalent or synonymous with the relief requested in the verified petition (i.e., reappointment as the Town’s Chief of Police).

However, we agree with respondent’s contention that its failure to reappoint petitioner in January 1993 is nonreviewable. The unofficial position of Chief of Police was neither a tenured or permanent civil service position or that of a public officer which would require formal charges and a hearing prior to respondent’s failure to reappoint (see, Matter of Green-smith v Incorporated Vil. of Centre Is., 109 AD2d 742). Accordingly, petitioner has failed to state a cause of action.

Petitioner’s further contentions are without merit.

Cardona P. J., Mercure, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner has held the noncompetitive position of Police Officer-Part Time from 1977 to the present.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

213 A.D.2d 814, 623 N.Y.S.2d 401, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henrich-v-town-board-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack