Henretty v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Henretty v. State

155 So. 3d 1254, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1053, 2015 WL 376226

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 29, 2015

DocketNo. 1D14-590

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 155 So. 3d 1254 (Henretty v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Henretty v. State, 155 So. 3d 1254, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1053, 2015 WL 376226 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Scott Phillip Henretty appeals his conviction and sentence, arguing that fundamental error occurred when the trial court failed to renew the offer of counsel prior to Henretty entering his plea and failed to renew the offer prior to the imposition of sentence. Pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.111(d)(5), if a waiver of counsel is accepted at any stage of the proceedings, the trial court shall renew the offer of counsel at each subsequent stage of the proceedings. Both plea hearings and sentencing are considered critical stages that require the renewal of the offer of counsel. Beard v. State, 751 So.2d 61, 62 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). This failure constitutes fundamental error under the facts of this case. Monte v. State, 51 So.3d 1196, 1201 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011); Smith v. State, 41 So.3d 1081, 1088 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010). We therefore vacate Henretty’s plea and sentence and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

THOMAS, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Scott Phillip Henretty appeals his conviction and sentence, arguing that fundamental error occurred when the trial court failed to renew the offer of counsel prior to Henretty entering his plea and failed to renew the offer prior to the imposition of sentence. Pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.111(d)(5), if a waiver of counsel is accepted at any stage of the proceedings, the trial court shall renew the offer of counsel at each subsequent stage of the proceedings. Both plea hearings and sentencing are considered critical stages that require the renewal of the offer of counsel. Beard v. State, 751 So.2d 61, 62 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). This failure constitutes fundamental error under the facts of this case. Monte v. State, 51 So.3d 1196, 1201 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011); Smith v. State, 41 So.3d 1081, 1088 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010). We therefore vacate Henretty’s plea and sentence and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

THOMAS, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

155 So. 3d 1254, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1053, 2015 WL 376226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henretty-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack