Henoud v. Apker

Fourth Circuit

Henoud v. Apker

621 F. App'x 734

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 7, 2015·No. No. 14-7369·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John Maurice Henoud, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Henoud v. Apker, No. 5:13-hc-02234-D (E.D.N.C. Sept. 9/2014). We grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris. We dispense with oral argument [735] because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John Maurice Henoud, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Henoud v. Apker, No. 5:13-hc-02234-D (E.D.N.C. Sept. 9/2014). We grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris. We dispense with oral argument [735] because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Henoud v. Apker, 621 F. App'x 734 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

621 F. App'x 734 (Henoud v. Apker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related