Henny v. Harvey

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 13, 2009·No. 09-6617·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6617

SHAWN X. HENNY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

A. P. HARVEY; B. WATSON; M. HENSLEY; DR. LOU CEI; P. SCARBERRY; LINDA B. SHEAR; LARRY HUFFMAN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:08-cv-00399-jct-mfu)

Submitted: October 27, 2009 Decided: November 13, 2009

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shawn X. Henny, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Shawn X. Henny appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment for Defendants in his action alleging

claims under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized

Persons Act and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Henny v. Harvey, No.

7:08-cv-00399-jct-mfu (W.D. Va. Mar. 27, 2009). We deny Henny’s

motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henny v. Harvey, (4th Cir. 2009).

Henny v. Harvey (Henny v. Harvey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related