Hennock v. Silver

260 A.D. 918, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5420

Opinion

Order affirmed, -with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Cohn, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents and votes to reverse and grant the motion with leave to the plaintiff to serve an amended complaint. (See Arnold v. Arnold, 90 N. Y. 580; Sweet v. Morrison, 103 id. 235, 241.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hennock v. Silver, 260 A.D. 918, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5420 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

260 A.D. 918 (Hennock v. Silver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arnold v. . Arnold
90 N.Y. 580 (New York Court of Appeals, 1882)