Hennock v. Land

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hennock v. Land

260 A.D. 918, 24 N.Y.S.2d 149, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5419

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 22, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 260 A.D. 918 (Hennock v. Land) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hennock v. Land, 260 A.D. 918, 24 N.Y.S.2d 149, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5419 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Orders affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Callahan, JJ.; O’Malley and Dore, JJ., dissent and vote to modify the orders appealed from by limiting the examination of defendant Land to items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8 and 9; by directing that the said defendant be. examined either by interrogatories or open commission, as the plaintiff elects, at Boston, Massachusetts, at a time and place to be specified in the order; if plaintiff elects an open commission, defendant to pay the expenses and counsel fees of his own attorney; and as so modified to affirm. (See Probst v. Frenkel, 240 App. Div. 504.) — The date for the examinartion to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orders affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Callahan, JJ.; O’Malley and Dore, JJ., dissent and vote to modify the orders appealed from by limiting the examination of defendant Land to items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8 and 9; by directing that the said defendant be. examined either by interrogatories or open commission, as the plaintiff elects, at Boston, Massachusetts, at a time and place to be specified in the order; if plaintiff elects an open commission, defendant to pay the expenses and counsel fees of his own attorney; and as so modified to affirm. (See Probst v. Frenkel, 240 App. Div. 504.) — The date for the examinartion to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 A.D. 918, 24 N.Y.S.2d 149, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hennock-v-land-nyappdiv-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack