Hennington v. Cunningham
452 So. 2d 997, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13899
Opinion
The trial court's finding of an implied grant of easement will not be disturbed because it is supported by competent and substantial evidence. See Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc., 418 So.2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). We remand, however, with instructions to amend the final judgment to include a legal description of the easement. See Roy v. Euro-Holland Vastgoed, B.V., 404 So.2d 410 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).
Affirmed and remanded with instructions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hennington v. Cunningham, 452 So. 2d 997, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13899 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).
452 So. 2d 997 (Hennington v. Cunningham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc.
418 So. 2d 437 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Roy v. Euro-Holland Vastgoed, BV
404 So. 2d 410 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)