Henningsen v. Thomas

Montana Supreme Court

Henningsen v. Thomas

89 P. 1133, 33 Mont. 538, 1906 Mont. LEXIS 26

Montana Supreme Court·Decided January 5, 1906·No. No. 2,202·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having been set for hearing this day, and it appearing to the court that 'briefs have not been filed [539]*539and counsel not appearing, it is ordered that the judgment of the court below made and entered on the 4th day of March A. D. 1904, be affirmed at the cost of the appellant.'

Mr. J. H. Baldwin, for Appellant. Messrs. Kirk & Clinton, and Mr. J. F. Davies, for Respondents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having been set for hearing this day, and it appearing to the court that 'briefs have not been filed [539]*539and counsel not appearing, it is ordered that the judgment of the court below made and entered on the 4th day of March A. D. 1904, be affirmed at the cost of the appellant.'

Mr. J. H. Baldwin, for Appellant. Messrs. Kirk & Clinton, and Mr. J. F. Davies, for Respondents.

Henningsen v. Thomas, 89 P. 1133, 33 Mont. 538, 1906 Mont. LEXIS 26 (Mo. 1906).

Pincite

89 P. 1133 (Henningsen v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.