Henning v. Martin
13 Pa. Super. 540, 1900 Pa. Super. LEXIS 195
Opinion
The item in the fee bill of 1898, “written notice in any case,, 25,” evidently means such notice as it is the duty of the justice-to give. It certainly does not include a notice to the plaintiff of the return day of the summons, and that the case will be-heard on that day. In taxing this fee against the defendant in. the case the justice incurred the penalty sued for, and the facts-alleged in the offers would have been no defense.
The assignments of error are overruled and the judgment is. affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Henning v. Martin, 13 Pa. Super. 540, 1900 Pa. Super. LEXIS 195 (Pa. Ct. App. 1900).
13 Pa. Super. 540 (Henning v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Whitmore v. Craig
32 Pa. Super. 292 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1907)
Wilson v. Barrett
24 Pa. Super. 68 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1903)