Henning v. Martin

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Henning v. Martin

13 Pa. Super. 540, 1900 Pa. Super. LEXIS 195

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 24, 1900

DocketAppeal, No. 157

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 13 Pa. Super. 540 (Henning v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Henning v. Martin, 13 Pa. Super. 540, 1900 Pa. Super. LEXIS 195 (Pa. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The item in the fee bill of 1898, “written notice in any case,, 25,” evidently means such notice as it is the duty of the justice-to give. It certainly does not include a notice to the plaintiff of the return day of the summons, and that the case will be-heard on that day. In taxing this fee against the defendant in. the case the justice incurred the penalty sued for, and the facts-alleged in the offers would have been no defense.

The assignments of error are overruled and the judgment is. affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The item in the fee bill of 1898, “written notice in any case,, 25,” evidently means such notice as it is the duty of the justice-to give. It certainly does not include a notice to the plaintiff of the return day of the summons, and that the case will be-heard on that day. In taxing this fee against the defendant in. the case the justice incurred the penalty sued for, and the facts-alleged in the offers would have been no defense.

The assignments of error are overruled and the judgment is. affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 Pa. Super. 540, 1900 Pa. Super. LEXIS 195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henning-v-martin-pasuperct-1900.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack