Henning v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad

35 Mo. 408
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedFebruary 15, 1865
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 35 Mo. 408 (Henning v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Henning v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad, 35 Mo. 408 (Mo. 1865).

Opinion

Dbtden, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an appeal from the justice’s court. In the Circuit Court the case was tried by a jury of six against the objections of the appellant, who required the jury to consist of twelve men. For this cause the judgment of the Circuit Court must, in accordance with the previous decisions of this court upon the questions here raised, be reversed. (Foster v. Kirby, 31 Mo. 496; Vaughan v. Scade, 30 id. 600.) It is not believed that a decision of the other question presented by the appellant would materially assist the Circuit Court in a re-trial of the case, and we will therefore pass them without further notice.

Judge Bay concurring,

the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scott v. Young
87 S.W. 544 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1905)
Lovings v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co.
35 S.E. 962 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1900)
State v. Van Matre
49 Mo. 268 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1872)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 Mo. 408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henning-v-hannibal-st-joseph-railroad-mo-1865.