Henning v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad

35 Mo. 408
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided February 15, 1865·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Dbtden, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an appeal from the justice’s court. In the Circuit Court the case was tried by a jury of six against the objections of the appellant, who required the jury to consist of twelve men. For this cause the judgment of the Circuit Court must, in accordance with the previous decisions of this court upon the questions here raised, be reversed. (Foster v. Kirby, 31 Mo. 496; Vaughan v. Scade, 30 id. 600.) It is not believed that a decision of the other question presented by the appellant would materially assist the Circuit Court in a re-trial of the case, and we will therefore pass them without further notice.

Judge Bay concurring,

the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henning v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad, 35 Mo. 408 (Mo. 1865).

35 Mo. 408 (Henning v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scott v. Young
87 S.W. 544 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1905)
Lovings v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co.
35 S.E. 962 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1900)
State v. Van Matre
49 Mo. 268 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1872)