Hennig v. Hennig

Supreme Court of Florida

Hennig v. Hennig

185 So. 2d 457, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3628

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedApril 20, 1966

DocketNo. 34465

StatusPublished

This text of 185 So. 2d 457 (Hennig v. Hennig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hennig v. Hennig, 185 So. 2d 457, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3628 (Fla. 1966).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this court, and the writ was issued. Argument has been heard and upon further consideration and a careful review of the briefs, we are unable to find sufficient conflict with the decisions of this court or of the other district courts of appeal to vest jurisdiction in this court as required by the Constitution, Article V, Section 4, F.S.A.

The writ therefore must be and it is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., and WARREN, Circuit Judge, concur. ERVIN, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI