Hennessy v. Walker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hennessy v. Walker

253 A.D. 861, 3 N.Y.S.2d 889, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8936

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 19, 1938·Published

Opinion

Respondents have judgments against appellant, the owner of a vehicle propelled by power other than “ muscular power ” ■ — ■ (semi-trailer), for negligent operation of the vehicle, and the judgment should be sustained. (Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 2, subd. 8; Id. § 59.) Judgments unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs. Present — Hill, P. J., McNamee, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Respondents have judgments against appellant, the owner of a vehicle propelled by power other than “ muscular power ” ■ — ■ (semi-trailer), for negligent operation of the vehicle, and the judgment should be sustained. (Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 2, subd. 8; Id. § 59.) Judgments unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs. Present — Hill, P. J., McNamee, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Hennessy v. Walker, 253 A.D. 861, 3 N.Y.S.2d 889, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8936 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

253 A.D. 861 (Hennessy v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.