Hennessy v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
This text of 66 F.3d 659 (Hennessy v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING
The petitions for rehearing filed by appellants in Nos. 94-1857; 94r-1933 and 94-1934 having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this court and to all the other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service, and no judge [661]*661who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service not having voted for rehearing by the court in banc, the petitions for rehearing are denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
66 F.3d 659, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 27621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hennessy-v-federal-deposit-insurance-corp-ca3-1995.