Hennessey v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Hennessey v. State

1912 OK CR 253, 120 P. 1126, 7 Okla. Crim. 702, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 32

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided February 3, 1912·No. No. A-1333.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted on the 3rd day of May, 1911, in the county court of Canadian county, on a charge of having the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to sell the same, and on the 27th day of said month was sentenced to pay a fine of fifty dollars and be confined in the county jail for a period of thirty days. Finding no error sufficient to justify a reversal, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. The judgment should be corrected to conform to the holding of this court in the case of Ex parte Harry, 6 Okla» Cr. 168, 117 Pac. 726, and the county court of Canadian county is directed to make such correction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted on the 3rd day of May, 1911, in the county court of Canadian county, on a charge of having the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to sell the same, and on the 27th day of said month was sentenced to pay a fine of fifty dollars and be confined in the county jail for a period of thirty days. Finding no error sufficient to justify a reversal, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. The judgment should be corrected to conform to the holding of this court in the case of Ex parte Harry, 6 Okla» Cr. 168, 117 Pac. 726, and the county court of Canadian county is directed to make such correction.

Hennessey v. State, 1912 OK CR 253, 120 P. 1126, 7 Okla. Crim. 702, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 32 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

1912 OK CR 253 (Hennessey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related