Hennessey v. Hennessey
166 N.E. 345, 250 N.Y. 614, 1929 N.Y. LEXIS 1014
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs. First question certified answered “ yes.” Second question answered “ no; ” no opinion.
Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hennessey v. Hennessey, 166 N.E. 345, 250 N.Y. 614, 1929 N.Y. LEXIS 1014 (N.Y. 1929).
166 N.E. 345 (Hennessey v. Hennessey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gallagher v. Gallagher
191 Misc. 436 (New York Supreme Court, 1947)