Hennessey v. Budde

82 F. 541, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2775
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedAugust 26, 1897
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 82 F. 541 (Hennessey v. Budde) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hennessey v. Budde, 82 F. 541, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2775 (circtsdny 1897).

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

As the case stood when it was .sent to tlie referee, there was such a conflict of evidence on the face of the affidavits that complainant was not entitled to an order punishing the defendants, or either of them, for contempt. Had the matter stopped there, the application would have been denied, without costs. Hoping, however, to make out a case of violation of the injunction, complainant proceeded to the reference, and, if unsuccessful, should pay the costs thereof.

Before the referee, complainant, irrespective even of Duffy’s testimony, made out a prima facie case, but upon all material points defendants’ witnesses flatly contradicted those called by the complainant; and the court sees no reason to overrule the conclusions of the referee, who saw the witnesses and heard their testimony. The objections to report are overruled, report confirmed, and order to that effect entered, providing that complainant pays the referee’s fees and expenses of the reference. Referee’s fee is fixed at $75

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chauncey v. Dyke Bros.
119 F. 1 (Eighth Circuit, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 F. 541, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hennessey-v-budde-circtsdny-1897.