Henner v. Everdry Marketing & Management, Inc.

74 A.D.3d 1778, 902 N.Y.S.2d 485
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Henner v. Everdry Marketing & Management, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 74 A.D.3d 1776
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 11, 2010·No. Appeal No. 2·Published

Opinion

and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Thomas A. Stander, J.), entered June 12, 2009. The order denied in part the motion of defendants Continental Casualty Company, Transportation Insurance Company, and American [1779]*1779Casualty Company of Reading, PA for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by denying the motion in its entirety and reinstating the complaint in its entirety against defendants Continental Casualty Company, Transportation Insurance Company, and American Casualty Company of Reading, PA and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Henner v Ever dry Mktg. & Mgt., Inc. (74 AD3d 1776 [2010]). Present—Smith, J.P., Carni, Lindley, Sconiers and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henner v. Everdry Marketing & Management, Inc., 74 A.D.3d 1778, 902 N.Y.S.2d 485 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

74 A.D.3d 1778 (Henner v. Everdry Marketing & Management, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henner v. Everdry Marketing & Management, Inc.
74 A.D.3d 1776 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)