Hennequin v. Clews

13 Jones & S. 108
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedMarch 3, 1879
StatusPublished

This text of 13 Jones & S. 108 (Hennequin v. Clews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hennequin v. Clews, 13 Jones & S. 108 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1879).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The finding upon the facts cannot be disturbed. Nor was the obligation on which the order of arrest was made, discharged by operation of the bankrupt act. There appeared on the argument to be a serious objection to granting an order of arrest in an action for an equitable cause. It was, however, answered, that the action, by the interlocutory judgment, had been turned "into a pure action at law. This seems to be sufficient, especially since no reversal of [114]*114that interlocutory judgment can take place, the judgment having been affirmed.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs, and disbursements to be taken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 Jones & S. 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hennequin-v-clews-nysuperctnyc-1879.