Henneghan v. Signet Construction Co.

235 F. App'x 126
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 8, 2007·No. No. 07-1265·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Gerald Henneghan seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint with respect to some Defendants and granting Henneghan ten days to amend his complaint with respect to the remaining Defendant. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Henneghan seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of [127]*127jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henneghan v. Signet Construction Co., 235 F. App'x 126 (4th Cir. 2007).

235 F. App'x 126 (Henneghan v. Signet Construction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)