Henne v. Morris
This text of 135 A.D.2d 607 (Henne v. Morris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— In an action to recover arrears of child support which are due and payable pursuant to a separation agreement, the defendant husband appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.), dated September 2, 1986, which, inter alia, awarded the plaintiff the sum of $15,091.90 in child support arrears.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the plaintiff was entitled to enforce the child support provisions of the parties’ separation agreement irrespective of the existence of certain Family Court orders subsequently obtained by the defendant directing him to pay lesser amounts of child support. The Family Court orders did not terminate the parties’ rights and obligations set forth in their separation agreement (see, Kleila v Kleila, 50 NY2d 277; Goldman v Goldman, 282 NY 296; Donnelly v Matheson, 112 AD2d 341; Burtch v Burtch, 98 AD2d 704).
We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Rubin and Spatt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
135 A.D.2d 607, 522 N.Y.S.2d 185, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henne-v-morris-nyappdiv-1987.